Wrenn v. DC

Wrenn v. DC

From LI | Appeals court invalidates D.C.’s “good reason” constraint on public carry of firearms:

Quote:




Attorney Alan Gura has scored another huge win for civil rights in today’s Wrenn v. DC decision out of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal District of Columbia Circuit (you know, the one Harry Reid blew up the fillibuster for in order to load it up with Progressive judges amenable to Obama’s “pen-and-a-phone” style of governance).


Wrenn v. DC, decided today, was a 2-1 decision by the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. The decision invalidates the District of Columbia’s prohibitionist “good reason” constraint on the lawful carry of arms in public for purposes of self-defense.


Circuit Judge Thomas B. Griffith (appointed by George W. Bush in 2005, 63 years old) and Senior Circuit Judge Stephen F. Williams (appointed by Ronald Reagan in 1986, 80 years old) signed off on the majority opinion, and Circuit Judge Karen L. Henderson (appointed by George H.W. Bush in 1990, 73 years old) wrote a dissent.




Now, this is certainly an interesting development and a great win for Alan Gura. There are several questions that arise from this decision. Is DC going to issue carry permits now to anyone? What does that mean for the Peruta case? Is SCOTUS now being forced to take up both conflicting cases?


Source: USA Carry

Leave a Comment